---
title: "Mumbai vs Tokyo: Class A office comparison"
description: "Side-by-side Class A office comparison for Mumbai and Tokyo — rent, vacancy, talent, tax, lease norms, transit, and top submarkets."
canonical: https://classa.info/compare/mumbai-vs-tokyo
pageType: comparison
lastUpdated: 2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z
license: "CC BY 4.0 with attribution to Class A Atlas (https://classa.info)."
---

> Mumbai ($46/sqft, 12.6% vacancy) and Tokyo ($113/sqft, 4.6% vacancy) compete on different axes: Mumbai on rent and tax and Tokyo on talent depth.

## TL;DR

- Class A rent: Mumbai $46/sqft vs Tokyo $113/sqft.
- Vacancy: Mumbai 12.6% vs Tokyo 4.6%.
- Talent index: Mumbai 60 vs Tokyo 84.
- Corporate tax: Mumbai 25.2% vs Tokyo 30.6%.
- Premium flex/seat/month: Mumbai $420 vs Tokyo $980.

# Mumbai vs Tokyo: Class A office comparison

**Mumbai ($46/sqft, 12.6% vacancy) and Tokyo ($113/sqft, 4.6% vacancy) compete on different axes: Mumbai on rent and tax and Tokyo on talent depth.**

## TL;DR

- [Class A](/glossary/class-a) rent: Mumbai $46/sqft vs Tokyo $113/sqft.
- Vacancy: Mumbai 12.6% vs Tokyo 4.6%.
- Talent index: Mumbai 60 vs Tokyo 84.
- Corporate tax: Mumbai 25.2% vs Tokyo 30.6%.
- [Premium flex](/topics/lease-vs-flex)/seat/month: Mumbai $420 vs Tokyo $980.

## Market data side-by-side

| Metric | Mumbai | Tokyo|

| Region | APAC | APAC|
| Country | India | Japan|
| Class A rent (USD/sqft/yr) | $46 | $113|
| Class A rent (local) | 320 INR | 50000 JPY|
| Vacancy | 12.6% | 4.6%|
| Trend | rising | rising|
| Prime yield | 7.5% | 3%|
| Premium flex / seat / month (USD) | $420 | $980|
| Submarkets covered | 4 | 6|
| Corporate tax | 25.2% | 30.6%|

## Lease norms

| Metric | Mumbai | Tokyo|

| Typical term | 5 yrs | 5 yrs|
| Typical rent-free | 4 mos | 4 mos|
| Lease norms | Standard 5-year lease (often 3+2 or 5+5). Rent quoted as INR per square foot per month. Maintenance billed separately. Security deposit of 6-12 months standard. Stamp duty payable on lease execution. | Tokyo leases are typically 5-7 years with a 2-year tenant notice. Standard leases are 'fixed-term' (teiki shakuya) or 'ordinary' (futsu shakuya) — fixed-term is increasingly common for Grade A. Rent is base + common-area maintenance billed separately. Restoration to original (genjo kaifuku) is contractual and significant. Personal seal (jitsuin) requirements apply.|
| Tax note | Headline corporate tax 25.2% (concessional 17.16% for new manufacturing). Maharashtra state taxes apply. | Effective corporate tax rate 30.6% (national + local). Tokyo Metropolitan corporate inhabitant tax adds a meaningful local component.|

## Talent

| Metric | Mumbai | Tokyo|

| Talent index (0–100) | 60 | 84|
| Talent note | India's deepest financial-services and tech talent pool. Average all-in compensation indexes 60. | The largest single-language white-collar talent pool in the world. Average all-in compensation for senior knowledge workers indexes 84 vs. New York's 100, though English-fluent bilingual talent commands a premium.|

## Transit & commute

**Mumbai:** Mumbai Suburban Railway is the primary mass transit. Mumbai Metro is expanding rapidly. Direct connection between BKC and the CBD remains the key infrastructure constraint.

**Tokyo:** JR Yamanote loop plus 13 metro lines connect every Class A address. Shinkansen termini at Tokyo, Shinagawa, and Ueno support inter-city corporate networks.

## Top submarkets — Mumbai

- [**Bandra-Kurla Complex (BKC)**](/cities/mumbai/bkc) — [trophy tier](/topics/trophy-asset-selection) · ₹380/sqft/mo · ≈ $54.7 PSF/yr USD
- [**Lower Parel & Worli**](/cities/mumbai/lower-parel-worli) — prime tier · ₹290/sqft/mo · ≈ $41.8 PSF/yr USD
- [**Powai**](/cities/mumbai/powai) — established tier · $38/sqft/yr

## Top submarkets — Tokyo

- [**Azabudai & Roppongi**](/cities/tokyo/azabudai-roppongi) — trophy tier · ¥60,000/[tsubo](/topics/apac-lease-conventions)">tsubo/mo · ≈ $136 PSF/yr USD
- [**Marunouchi & Otemachi**](/cities/tokyo/marunouchi-otemachi) — trophy tier · ¥55,000/tsubo/mo · ≈ $124 PSF/yr USD
- [**Toranomon**](/cities/tokyo/toranomon) — trophy tier · ¥50,000/tsubo/mo · ≈ $113 PSF/yr USD

## Decision criteria

### Pick by cost

Mumbai is the cheaper Class A market on a USD basis.

### Pick by talent depth

Tokyo has the deeper talent index (84/100 vs 60/100).

### Pick by tax

Mumbai has the lower headline corporate tax (25.2% vs 30.6%). Local incentives can change the effective rate materially.

### Pick by lease optionality

Mumbai typical term is 5 years with 4 months free; Tokyo runs 5 years with 4 months free.

### Pick by transit

Mumbai: Mumbai Suburban Railway is the primary mass transit. Mumbai Metro is expanding rapidly. Direct connection between BKC and the CBD remains the key infrastructure constraint. Tokyo: JR Yamanote loop plus 13 metro lines connect every Class A address. Shinkansen termini at Tokyo, Shinagawa, and Ueno support inter-city corporate networks.

## Run a 4-city comparison

Score Mumbai, Tokyo and up to two more markets side-by-side on Class A rent, vacancy, talent, corporate tax, and premium flex pricing — all in USD.

[**Run a 4-city comparison →**](/tools/city-comparator)

## Frequently asked questions

****Is Class A office cheaper in Mumbai or Tokyo?****
: Mumbai is cheaper on a USD basis: $46/sqft vs $113/sqft.

****Which has better talent depth, Mumbai or Tokyo?****
: Tokyo indexes higher on talent depth (84 vs 60).

****Which has more sublease availability, Mumbai or Tokyo?****
: Mumbai carries higher vacancy (12.6% vs 4.6%) and therefore typically more [sublease](/topics/sublease-strategy)">sublease overhang.

****What lease term should I expect in Mumbai vs Tokyo?****
: Mumbai typical term is 5 years with 4 months rent-free; Tokyo typical term is 5 years with 4 months rent-free.

****How does transit and commuter access compare?****
: Mumbai: Mumbai Suburban Railway is the primary mass transit. Mumbai Metro is expanding rapidly. Direct connection between BKC and the CBD remains the key infrastructure constraint. Tokyo: JR Yamanote loop plus 13 metro lines connect every Class A address. Shinkansen termini at Tokyo, Shinagawa, and Ueno support inter-city corporate networks.

## Editorial provenance

Reviewed by [**Kenji Watanabe**](/about/authors/kenji-watanabe) — APAC contributing editor. Last updated 2026-04-15. See our [methodology](/about/methodology) and [editorial standards](/about/editorial-standards).

### Primary sources for this page

- [CBRE Marketview reports](https://www.cbre.com/insights) — CBRE
- [JLL Office Insight](https://www.jll.com/en/trends-and-insights) — JLL
- [Cushman & Wakefield Marketbeat](https://www.cushmanwakefield.com/en/insights) — Cushman & Wakefield
- [Savills World Research](https://www.savills.com/research_articles/) — Savills
- [Colliers Global Office Outlook](https://www.colliers.com/en/research) — Colliers

[Full sources index](/about/sources) · [Submit a correction](/about/corrections)

---

Citation: Source: Class A Atlas (https://classa.info/compare/mumbai-vs-tokyo), updated 2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z.
