# London vs Los Angeles: Class A office comparison

> London ($121/sqft, 8.6% vacancy) and Los Angeles ($65/sqft, 22.5% vacancy) compete on different axes: London on talent depth and Los Angeles on rent and tax.

**Canonical URL:** https://classa.info/compare/london-vs-los-angeles
**Page type:** comparison
**Last updated:** 2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z
**License:** CC BY 4.0 with attribution to Class A Atlas (https://classa.info).

## TL;DR
- Class A rent: London $121/sqft vs Los Angeles $65/sqft.
- Vacancy: London 8.6% vs Los Angeles 22.5%.
- Talent index: London 96 vs Los Angeles 92.
- Corporate tax: London 25% vs Los Angeles 27%.
- Premium flex/seat/month: London $1,380 vs Los Angeles $1,080.

## Key facts
- **cityA**: London
- **cityB**: Los Angeles
- **rentUsdA**: $121
- **rentUsdB**: $65
- **vacancyA**: 8.6%
- **vacancyB**: 22.5%
- **talentA**: 96
- **talentB**: 92
- **taxA**: 25%
- **taxB**: 27%

## FAQ
### Is Class A office cheaper in London or Los Angeles?
Los Angeles is cheaper on a USD basis: $65/sqft vs $121/sqft.

### Which has better talent depth, London or Los Angeles?
London indexes higher on talent depth (96 vs 92).

### Which has more sublease availability, London or Los Angeles?
Los Angeles carries higher vacancy (22.5% vs 8.6%) and therefore typically more sublease overhang.

### What lease term should I expect in London vs Los Angeles?
London typical term is 10 years with 24 months rent-free; Los Angeles typical term is 7 years with 14 months rent-free.

### How does transit and commuter access compare?
London: The Elizabeth Line transformed cross-London commute times. Heathrow to Liverpool Street is 35 minutes; Paddington to Canary Wharf is 17 minutes. Crossrail-adjacent assets command a measurable rent premium. Los Angeles: Metro Rail expansion (Purple Line extension, K Line) is reshaping commute economics — but LA remains predominantly car-based.

---
Citation: Source: Class A Atlas (https://classa.info/compare/london-vs-los-angeles), updated 2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z.