# Hong Kong vs Sydney: Class A office comparison

> Hong Kong ($123/sqft, 12.8% vacancy) and Sydney ($89/sqft, 12.6% vacancy) compete on different axes: Hong Kong on talent depth and Sydney on rent and tax.

**Canonical URL:** https://classa.info/compare/hong-kong-vs-sydney
**Page type:** comparison
**Last updated:** 2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z
**License:** CC BY 4.0 with attribution to Class A Atlas (https://classa.info).

## TL;DR
- Class A rent: Hong Kong $123/sqft vs Sydney $89/sqft.
- Vacancy: Hong Kong 12.8% vs Sydney 12.6%.
- Talent index: Hong Kong 88 vs Sydney 85.
- Corporate tax: Hong Kong 16.5% vs Sydney 30%.
- Premium flex/seat/month: Hong Kong $1,320 vs Sydney $990.

## Key facts
- **cityA**: Hong Kong
- **cityB**: Sydney
- **rentUsdA**: $123
- **rentUsdB**: $89
- **vacancyA**: 12.8%
- **vacancyB**: 12.6%
- **talentA**: 88
- **talentB**: 85
- **taxA**: 16.5%
- **taxB**: 30%

## FAQ
### Is Class A office cheaper in Hong Kong or Sydney?
Sydney is cheaper on a USD basis: $89/sqft vs $123/sqft.

### Which has better talent depth, Hong Kong or Sydney?
Hong Kong indexes higher on talent depth (88 vs 85).

### Which has more sublease availability, Hong Kong or Sydney?
Hong Kong carries higher vacancy (12.8% vs 12.6%) and therefore typically more sublease overhang.

### What lease term should I expect in Hong Kong vs Sydney?
Hong Kong typical term is 3 years with 8 months rent-free; Sydney typical term is 7 years with 30 months rent-free.

### How does transit and commuter access compare?
Hong Kong: MTR coverage across the entire Class A footprint. Airport Express to Chek Lap Kok in 24 minutes from Central. The Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macau Bridge and Express Rail to Shenzhen and Guangzhou support cross-border occupier strategies. Sydney: Sydney Metro and Sydney Trains converge at Wynyard, Town Hall, and Central. The new Sydney Metro City & Southwest line transformed core CBD commute capacity.

---
Citation: Source: Class A Atlas (https://classa.info/compare/hong-kong-vs-sydney), updated 2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z.