# Hong Kong vs Seoul: Class A office comparison

> Hong Kong ($123/sqft, 12.8% vacancy) and Seoul ($34/sqft, 5.2% vacancy) compete on different axes: Hong Kong on talent depth and Seoul on rent and tax.

**Canonical URL:** https://classa.info/compare/hong-kong-vs-seoul
**Page type:** comparison
**Last updated:** 2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z
**License:** CC BY 4.0 with attribution to Class A Atlas (https://classa.info).

## TL;DR
- Class A rent: Hong Kong $123/sqft vs Seoul $34/sqft.
- Vacancy: Hong Kong 12.8% vs Seoul 5.2%.
- Talent index: Hong Kong 88 vs Seoul 82.
- Corporate tax: Hong Kong 16.5% vs Seoul 24.2%.
- Premium flex/seat/month: Hong Kong $1,320 vs Seoul $880.

## Key facts
- **cityA**: Hong Kong
- **cityB**: Seoul
- **rentUsdA**: $123
- **rentUsdB**: $34
- **vacancyA**: 12.8%
- **vacancyB**: 5.2%
- **talentA**: 88
- **talentB**: 82
- **taxA**: 16.5%
- **taxB**: 24.2%

## FAQ
### Is Class A office cheaper in Hong Kong or Seoul?
Seoul is cheaper on a USD basis: $34/sqft vs $123/sqft.

### Which has better talent depth, Hong Kong or Seoul?
Hong Kong indexes higher on talent depth (88 vs 82).

### Which has more sublease availability, Hong Kong or Seoul?
Hong Kong carries higher vacancy (12.8% vs 5.2%) and therefore typically more sublease overhang.

### What lease term should I expect in Hong Kong vs Seoul?
Hong Kong typical term is 3 years with 8 months rent-free; Seoul typical term is 5 years with 6 months rent-free.

### How does transit and commuter access compare?
Hong Kong: MTR coverage across the entire Class A footprint. Airport Express to Chek Lap Kok in 24 minutes from Central. The Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macau Bridge and Express Rail to Shenzhen and Guangzhou support cross-border occupier strategies. Seoul: Seoul Metro covers every Class A address. KTX high-speed rail to Busan and other regional centres. Incheon Airport is 53 minutes by AREX express.

---
Citation: Source: Class A Atlas (https://classa.info/compare/hong-kong-vs-seoul), updated 2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z.