# Chicago vs Los Angeles: Class A office comparison

> Chicago ($52/sqft, 24.5% vacancy) and Los Angeles ($65/sqft, 22.5% vacancy) compete on different axes: Chicago on rent and tax and Los Angeles on talent depth.

**Canonical URL:** https://classa.info/compare/chicago-vs-los-angeles
**Page type:** comparison
**Last updated:** 2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z
**License:** CC BY 4.0 with attribution to Class A Atlas (https://classa.info).

## TL;DR
- Class A rent: Chicago $52/sqft vs Los Angeles $65/sqft.
- Vacancy: Chicago 24.5% vs Los Angeles 22.5%.
- Talent index: Chicago 88 vs Los Angeles 92.
- Corporate tax: Chicago 28.5% vs Los Angeles 27%.
- Premium flex/seat/month: Chicago $920 vs Los Angeles $1,080.

## Key facts
- **cityA**: Chicago
- **cityB**: Los Angeles
- **rentUsdA**: $52
- **rentUsdB**: $65
- **vacancyA**: 24.5%
- **vacancyB**: 22.5%
- **talentA**: 88
- **talentB**: 92
- **taxA**: 28.5%
- **taxB**: 27%

## FAQ
### Is Class A office cheaper in Chicago or Los Angeles?
Chicago is cheaper on a USD basis: $52/sqft vs $65/sqft.

### Which has better talent depth, Chicago or Los Angeles?
Los Angeles indexes higher on talent depth (92 vs 88).

### Which has more sublease availability, Chicago or Los Angeles?
Chicago carries higher vacancy (24.5% vs 22.5%) and therefore typically more sublease overhang.

### What lease term should I expect in Chicago vs Los Angeles?
Chicago typical term is 10 years with 22 months rent-free; Los Angeles typical term is 7 years with 14 months rent-free.

### How does transit and commuter access compare?
Chicago: CTA L lines and Metra commuter rail. Union Station and Ogilvie anchor commuter rail; Loop Elevated lines circle the historic CBD. Los Angeles: Metro Rail expansion (Purple Line extension, K Line) is reshaping commute economics — but LA remains predominantly car-based.

---
Citation: Source: Class A Atlas (https://classa.info/compare/chicago-vs-los-angeles), updated 2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z.